World-class technology to enable world-class manufacturing
Connect, unify and label all of your factory data
Restructure data from multiple plant sources
Benchmark, monitor, and improve productivity
Drive operational improvements across your enterprise applications
Delivering value to the entire organization.
Solving manufacturing’s biggest challenges.
AI and Machine Learning for manufacturing.
In order for data to support digital manufacturing initiatives, it is critical to understand its readiness for integration with other production data sources. The ability to join, blend and integrate multiple sources of manufacturing data into digital twins of production processes, lines, plants, and parts is a foundational requirement to become a data-driven manufacturer. Unfortunately, most manufacturers don’t understand the condition or readiness of their production data until after their project has begun.
Through a decade of experience and numerous engagements, we’ve found that performing a comprehensive data assessment is the most crucial step for ensuring a project is successful in delivering and scaling value. The results of this assessment allow manufacturers to properly scope project objectives, expectations, and timelines. Most importantly, by going through this assessment process, manufacturers gain organizational alignment on what is required to enable the real-time use of production data. Performing a readiness assessment is the first step in building a digital manufacturing data and transformation strategy.
At Sight Machine, we’ve developed a process for assessing production data to better understand its ability to deliver business impact. The Sight Machine Data Readiness Assessment examines the attributes we’ve found to be most critical for integrating production data in real time with other sources. These include:
To support real-time manufacturing analytics capabilities, a data source must be ready in all six areas. By assessing the readiness of each source, a manufacturer will be able to properly scope project timelines and budget.
The Data Readiness Assessment is a valuable tool for analyzing the ability of individual data sources to support real-time manufacturing analytics capabilities. To properly analyze and optimize manufacturing processes, manufacturers need to integrate data from multiple sources involved in and affecting production. For production analysis, typically, these sources fall into seven categories, inclusive of energy and other relevant external data sources utilized in and affecting the production environment.
Time series information typically acquired from a Historian or SCADA system. Typical formats include:
The type of product/batch being produced on a machine or process. This can include batches of input materials, the output batch number, or other serialization/SKU information. Frequently this is associated with time stamps from other sources, but can also require process-specific business logic. This is typically captured through three methods:
Associate downtime reasons with downtime events (detected with machine data). This typically comes from one of the following sources:
Quality data and associating defect or scrap information is added to the batch or timestamp of machine production and used as a categorical variable in analysis. This should be a predefined list of defect codes. In many organizations, this may be a defect code hierarchy. Common data sources are:
Integrate energy data with production data to track consumption at each phase of the production process. Common sources include digital meters or utility data integration for:
Maintenance data is used to track asset health and schedule adherence, and to differentiate between scheduled and performed maintenance vs. unplanned downtime events. Data sources include:
Internal and external climate data sources provide context for the overall production environment and process. Common data sources include:
The Data Readiness Assessment examines a data source’s condition across each of the categories above, allowing a manufacturer to determine if the data falls into one of three levels:
The data source is ready to be used for real-time manufacturing analytics efforts.
Development resources can be applied to ready the data. This has implications for project timelines and budgets.
Data access and utility may require additional research, process changes, or IT infrastructure to be suitable for real-time analysis. This has implications for project timelines, budgets, and the use cases that can be addressed.
Sight Machine works with global manufacturers looking to use production data to predict machine failure, optimize processes, increase output, and improve sustainability. During our work, we’ve discovered that shortcomings in the condition of the data and the related infrastructure supporting making it ready for use result in unfulfilled expectations.
At Sight Machine, we’ve developed a process for assessing production data to better understand its ability to deliver business impact. The Sight Machine Data Readiness Assessment examines the 6 attributes we’ve found to be most critical for integrating production data in real time with other sources.
To support real-time manufacturing analytics capabilities, a data source must be ready in all six areas. By assessing the readiness of each source, a manufacturer will be able to properly scope project timelines and budget.
In order for data to support digital manufacturing initiatives, it is critical to understand its readiness for integration with other production data sources. The ability to join, blend and integrate multiple sources of manufacturing data into digital twins of production processes, lines, plants, and parts is a foundational requirement to become a data-driven manufacturer. Unfortunately, most manufacturers don’t understand the condition or readiness of their production data until after their project has begun.
Through a decade of experience and numerous engagements, we’ve found that performing a comprehensive data assessment is the most crucial step for ensuring a project is successful in delivering and scaling value. The results of this assessment allow manufacturers to properly scope project objectives, expectations, and timelines. Most importantly, by going through the assessment process, manufacturers gain organizational alignment on what is required to enable the real-time use of production data. Performing a readiness assessment is the first step in building a digital manufacturing data and transformation strategy.
At Sight Machine, we’ve developed a process for assessing production data to better understand its ability to deliver business impact. The Sight Machine Data Readiness Assessment examines the attributes we’ve found to be most critical for integrating production data in real time with other sources. These include:
To support real-time manufacturing analytics capabilities, a data source must be ready in all six areas. By assessing the readiness of each source, a manufacturer will be able to properly scope project timelines and budget.
The Data Readiness Assessment is a valuable tool for analyzing the ability of individual data sources to support real-time manufacturing analytics capabilities. To properly analyze and optimize manufacturing processes, manufacturers need to integrate data from multiple sources involved in and affecting production. For production analysis, typically, these sources fall into seven categories, inclusive of energy and other relevant external data sources utilized in and affecting the production environment.
DATA CATEGORY | TYPICAL CHARACTERISTICS |
---|---|
Machine and Sensor Information | Time series information typically acquired from a Historian or SCADA system. Typical formats include:
|
Product/Batch Information | The type of product/batch being produced on a machine or process. This can include batches of input materials, the output batch number, or other serialization/SKU information. Frequently this is associated with time stamps from other sources but can also require process-specific business logic. This is typically captured through three methods:
|
Downtime Classification | Associate downtime reasons with downtime events (detected with machine data). This typically comes from one of the following sources:
|
Quality, Defect, or Scrap Information | Quality data and associating defect or scrap information is added to the batch or timestamp of machine production and used as a categorical variable in analysis. This should be a predefined list of defect codes. In many organizations, this may be a defect code hierarchy. Common data sources are:
|
Energy/Resource Consumption | Integrate energy data with production data to track consumption at each phase of the production process. Common sources include:
|
Maintenance | Maintenance data is used to track asset health and schedule adherence, and to differentiate between scheduled and performed maintenance vs. unplanned downtime events. Data sources include:
|
Local Climate Conditions | Internal and external climate data sources provide context for the overall production environment and process. Common data sources include:
|
The Data Readiness Assessment examines a data source’s condition across each of the categories above, allowing a manufacturer to determine if the data falls into one of three levels:
The data source is ready to be used for real-time manufacturing analytics efforts.
Development resources can be applied to ready the data. This has implications for project timelines and budgets.
Data access and utility may require additional research, process changes, or IT infrastructure to be suitable for real-time analysis. This has implications for project timelines, budgets, and the use cases that can be addressed.
This is an necessary category.
This is an non-necessary category.